Comments
|
|
|
Comments: 58 | Prop Total: 0 | Avg: 0
|
|
| Photo | Video | News | Wall | |
|
(July 1, 2008 at 11:37)
(Below Threshold) show comment
Taken by Joe Sanders-Earley. |
|
|
How will you manage to fit the chains that aren't fitted to the mech without constantly falling off? Its easy on a geared bike because the mech tensions it or you have horizontal dropouts on a SS bike to pull the chain back to correct tension but the orange chain will need a tensioner and you'll have to fit horizontal dropouts on the rear for the green one to work. |
|
Its a Trek Jack, a new one that isnt out yet IIRC. |
|
|
Ok I'll write in behalf of my friend who wrote this on my account. Although it was a rather rude response, there is some constructive criticism to consider. The frame splits into to right? Bear in mind this will weaken the frame and will be wider so may hit the cranks. No freehub? How are you going to freewheel or fit the cassette then? On another of your designs (the latest one) you've got a single pivot design which is notorious for chain growth, bear in mind its going around the pivot on an axis the chain will grow, this isn't a problem on bikes like a 224 as you've got a mech on the bike which tensions the chain. Also, how on earth will a cassette stop chain growth without changing gear? |
|
|
|
You sir are an absolute idiot. The chain length will change so your chain will go extremely slack and fall off. You'll hit the mech and the cassette with your foot. How will you fit a freehub to the frame, and how would you get it out for servicing? The frame will become so weak with a hole for the mech and the freehub that it will snap. On top of that, when the frame compresses, the swingarm will hit the derailleur and the cassette. Why do this much work for gcse? I made a safe out of plywood with a really simple electronic lock and I got an A. Waste of time, effort and money. On top of that it's possibly the worst frame design I've ever seen. I'd rather race an apollo or a shockwave than this. Idiot. |
|
|
Its a Canon 430ex flashgun triggered wirelessly by a Canon ST-E2 on top of a Canon 40d. |
|
|
Looks shiny man, hardly ridden the 456 since I'm at uni now, and have jump and a DH bike. Get yerself on ukmb! |
|
Yup, its very similar to the viaduct in Brighton, though, that takes the train across from London Road to Brighton station, over the main road into Brighton from London... |
|
Errr, no, if you were to take a photo with the wheels spinning and the spokes the blurred the rider would not be that crisp, it disobeys the laws of photography. Obviously photoshopped/played with when developing but its a good image anyhoo. |
|
|
yup, before it was dirtied by the new 'head mechanic'  |
|
|
Good image, but for sure isn't a photo, it has blatently been fiddled with alot. Mags do photoshop images but hardly at all, altering sharpness but this isn't photography, and you wouldn't find this in a real bike mag cos anyone can do it thats why nobody gets paid for it. |
|
|
On the right, below the 3 WTB ones in grey boxes...theres 4 in plastic. |
|
That stem looks stupid and will ruin the ride of that bike. Get a shorter one or you will look like the biggest n00b ever. |
|
You've lost your front wheel mate... |
|
|
I wouldnt put more than 130mm on that. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry Rucho, but yours is much worse. http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/745656/ Twat. |
|
Ok, so its not a huge huck, but its a good photo, with good focus on it, which alot of people can't do for shit and end up focussing the whole frame. Its a good pic, well done. |
|
I won't regret it. It is at the right height for my legs, having it that height stops me f*cking up my knees and getting cramp. |
|
